DORA compliance is now mandatory for crypto firms operating in the EU as of January 17, 2025. Here’s what you need to know to stay compliant and avoid steep penalties:
-
What is DORA?
The Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) establishes rules for managing risks related to information and communication technology (ICT) in financial institutions, including crypto-asset service providers (CASPs). It ensures firms can handle and recover from tech disruptions like cyberattacks or system failures. -
Key Requirements for Crypto Firms:
- ICT Risk Management: Implement frameworks for identifying and mitigating risks.
- Incident Response: Establish clear plans for detecting, reporting, and resolving incidents.
- System Testing: Regularly conduct security checks like penetration testing.
- Third-Party Oversight: Monitor vendor compliance and include DORA requirements in contracts.
- Governance: Assign roles like Chief Risk Officer to oversee compliance.
-
Penalties for Non-Compliance:
Fines can reach up to 2% of global annual revenue or €1,000,000, whichever is higher. -
Next Steps:
- Conduct a gap analysis to identify compliance issues.
- Create an inventory of critical systems and vendors.
- Strengthen cybersecurity measures, including multi-layered security protocols and regular testing.
- Train staff on incident response and maintain detailed documentation.
Quick Tip: Smaller firms and startups should prioritize risk management and vendor oversight, as these areas often present the biggest challenges.
DORA is not just about compliance – it’s about building a resilient foundation for your crypto business. Take action now to meet these requirements and protect your operations.
Navigating DORA Compliance: Preparing for the EU’s New …
Checking Your Current Compliance Status
Identifying Gaps in Compliance
Start by performing an ICT gap analysis to determine where your organization might fall short of DORA requirements. Focus on the five key areas outlined by DORA: ICT risk management, incident reporting, resilience testing, information sharing, and third-party risk management [3].
Joe Ciancimino, Senior Director of SOC Practice at IS Partners, explains:
"how financial institutions define the scope of their ICT ecosystem, and from there, how the specific directives of the regulation impact their ICT scope. Establishing clear boundaries around what systems, vendors, and data flows fall under DORA’s oversight is crucial for compliance and risk management." [2]
When conducting your assessment, pay attention to the following key areas:
| Component | Focus Area | Required Documentation |
|---|---|---|
| Risk Framework | ICT policies and procedures | Security protocols, risk matrices |
| Incident Management | Response capabilities | Reporting procedures, escalation paths |
| Testing Programs | Security validation methods | Test results, vulnerability reports |
| Vendor Management | Third-party oversight | Contracts, service agreements |
Cataloging Critical Systems and Vendors
After identifying compliance gaps, create a detailed inventory of all critical systems and vendors. This should include systems like trading platforms, custody services, settlement systems, data storage, and security monitoring tools.
For third-party vendors, DORA emphasizes oversight of providers offering digital and data-related services through ICT systems, including cloud services, software vendors, and data analytics platforms [4]. Evaluate each vendor based on:
- Service importance to your operations
- Their compliance with DORA
- Security protocols they have in place
- Their incident response procedures
- Whether contracts align with DORA’s requirements
Reviewing and Strengthening Emergency Response Plans
With gaps identified and systems mapped, review your emergency response plans to ensure they can handle cyber incidents and maintain operations during disruptions [5].
"Financial entities shall implement the ICT business continuity policy through dedicated, appropriate and documented arrangements, plans, procedures and mechanisms." [5]
To enhance your response capabilities, focus on the following:
-
Develop Clear Response and Training Plans
- Draft incident playbooks with specific remediation steps
- Conduct regular training sessions for cyber incident response
- Clearly outline escalation procedures for incidents
-
Evaluate Response Effectiveness
- Run tabletop exercises simulating cyber crises
- Record and analyze the outcomes
- Update protocols based on lessons learned
Creating a DORA Risk Management System
Setting Up Risk Management Teams
Managing risks effectively begins with assigning key senior roles for crypto operations and ensuring compliance with DORA.
Here’s a clear governance framework outlining specific responsibilities:
| Role | Primary Responsibilities | Reporting Structure |
|---|---|---|
| Chief Risk Officer | Develops overall ICT risk strategy, reports to the Board | Reports to Board |
| ICT Risk Manager | Handles daily risk operations, implements the framework | Reports to CRO |
| Compliance Lead | Monitors DORA requirements, liaises with regulators | Reports to CRO |
| Technical Lead | Assesses system vulnerabilities, implements security measures | Reports to ICT Risk Manager |
Once roles are assigned, the next step is setting up strong risk control measures.
Building Risk Control Methods
After identifying compliance gaps, the next focus is creating a comprehensive ICT risk assessment and control framework.
Your approach should include:
-
Risk Assessment Protocol
Develop a structured method for identifying and evaluating risks. This should cover system dependency mapping, recovery objectives, and continuous monitoring systems [2]. -
Control Implementation
Put safeguards in place, such as:- Firewalls and malware protection
- Multi-factor authentication
- Encryption for digital asset storage
- Access control systems
- Regular backup procedures
-
Documentation and Training
Maintain detailed records of control measures and provide ongoing staff training to ensure everyone is prepared.
Regular Risk Monitoring
Once control measures are established, continuous monitoring is essential to identify and address new threats. Align your monitoring efforts with existing incident response protocols to maintain a unified risk management approach.
Key areas to monitor include:
| Component | Monitoring Focus | Action Triggers |
|---|---|---|
| System Health | Tracks performance metrics and uptime | Alerts for performance degradation |
| Security Events | Detects unauthorized access or suspicious activities | Immediate notification to security team |
| Compliance Status | Ensures adherence to regulatory requirements | Automated compliance reports |
| Vendor Performance | Evaluates third-party service reliability | Breaches in service agreements |
A structured reporting system should support this by:
- Generating daily operational risk reports
- Providing monthly compliance updates
- Conducting quarterly risk reviews
- Sending immediate alerts for critical incidents
sbb-itb-e0da796
Security and Incident Management
Updating Security Rules
DORA requires crypto firms to adopt a multi-layered security approach to protect both digital and physical assets from vulnerabilities.
Here’s a breakdown of key security layers:
| Security Layer | Measures | Implementation Focus |
|---|---|---|
| Network Security | Firewalls, encryption, access controls | Real-time threat monitoring |
| Physical Security | Access restrictions, environmental controls | Safeguards against theft, fire, and floods |
| System Security | Authentication protocols, backup systems | Regular patches and updates |
| Data Protection | Encryption standards, access logging | Secure storage and transmission |
Once these layers are in place, the next priority is setting up effective protocols for identifying potential threats.
Setting Up Incident Detection
Automated monitoring combined with clear response protocols is key to identifying incidents quickly. A strong detection framework ensures fast recognition and categorization of security events.
Key areas of focus include:
| Detection Area | Monitoring Focus | Response Trigger |
|---|---|---|
| System Performance | Uptime, response times | Signs of performance degradation |
| Security Events | Unauthorized access attempts | Unusual activity patterns |
| Infrastructure Status | Hardware/software health | System failures |
| Third-party Services | Vendor system status | Service disruptions |
"The largest risk the regulation aims to counteract is the level to which the European financial system is interconnected, with an availability issue causing large-scale financial systems to be unavailable due to the interconnected webs that the European financial ecosystem relies upon", explains Ciancimino from IS Partners [2].
After detection, the next step is to ensure incidents are documented and communicated effectively.
Creating Incident Reports
DORA requires crypto firms to follow a structured approach to incident reporting. This ensures thorough documentation and timely communication with the authorities.
Here’s what a complete incident report should include:
| Report Component | Required Information | Timing Description |
|---|---|---|
| Initial Assessment | Incident severity and impact scope | Immediately after detection |
| Detailed Analysis | Root cause and affected systems | As soon as possible |
| Response Actions | Containment measures and resolution steps | Ongoing during the incident |
| Recovery Status | System restoration efforts and preventive measures | After the incident is resolved |
"DORA is a cornerstone of the EU’s efforts to enhance the operational resilience of the financial sector against ICT-related risks" [1].
"We are seeing more clients focus on operational resilience and believe DORA ultimately will support the protection of investors and the market overall" [1].
Testing and Improving Security Measures
Security Testing Methods
Effective security measures require consistent testing to ensure defenses are up to par. Crypto firms should routinely assess their systems using methods like vulnerability scans, penetration testing, and simulated cyberattacks. For high-risk environments, Threat-Led Penetration Testing (TLPT) must be conducted every three years [2].
Here’s a quick look at key security testing methods:
| Method | Key Components |
|---|---|
| Vulnerability Scans and Penetration Testing | Regular evaluations to spot weaknesses, verify patch updates, and assess access controls |
| Threat-Led Penetration Testing (TLPT) | Advanced attack simulations required every three years [2] |
| Security Awareness Exercises | Phishing simulations to prepare employees for real-world threats |
Emergency Response Drills
Emergency response drills are critical for testing and improving incident response plans. For instance, Bitstamp runs "Failure Fridays", where they simulate potential failures in a controlled environment. These exercises focus on:
| Drill Component | Focus |
|---|---|
| Scenario Simulation | Replicating infrastructure or application failures |
| Team Communication | Testing how well teams collaborate across functions |
| Recovery Testing | Ensuring systems can be restored quickly and effectively |
| After-Action Review | Recording lessons learned to refine response strategies |
A notable example occurred in September 2023, when the SEAL Chaos Team conducted a simulated attack on the Yearn DeFi protocol. They identified the root cause in just 34 minutes and secured the assets within 56 minutes. Mark Lance, Vice President of Digital Forensics and Incident Response at GuidePoint Security, highlighted the value of such drills:
"A crisis simulation not only familiarizes teams with their incident response processes, but it also builds awareness of relevant threats, the associated risks, and critical decisions." [6]
Using Test Results
The real value of testing lies in analyzing the outcomes to strengthen security. After each test or drill, review the results thoroughly to address any vulnerabilities:
| Assessment Area | Focus |
|---|---|
| Vulnerability Assessment | Identifying and prioritizing risks for remediation |
| Response Time Analysis | Evaluating detection and resolution speeds to improve procedures |
| Control Effectiveness | Measuring how well security measures perform |
| Team Performance | Pinpointing areas where additional training is needed |
Regular Security Assessment Reports (SARs) play a key role in meeting DORA compliance. These reports document improvements and create a feedback loop that ensures operational resilience evolves over time. By consistently reviewing and updating security measures, organizations can stay ahead of emerging threats.
Conclusion: Next Steps for DORA Compliance
Key Compliance Areas to Address
With the January 17, 2025 deadline approaching, it’s time to focus on meeting DORA requirements. Here’s a quick overview of the main areas and actions you need to prioritize:
| Compliance Area | Key Requirements | Action Urgency |
|---|---|---|
| ICT Risk Management | Conduct risk assessments, map systems, set up monitoring | Immediate |
| Incident Response | Establish detection systems, reporting workflows, and response teams | High |
| Security Testing | Implement TLPT, perform vulnerability assessments | Medium-High |
| Third-Party Management | Vet providers, include protections in contracts | Medium |
| Governance Structure | Define roles clearly, ensure management oversight | High |
Specialized tools can simplify and streamline these processes.
FirstByt Compliance Tools
FirstByt’s Enterprise solution is designed to cover all aspects of DORA compliance, offering a range of integrated tools:
| Component | Functionality |
|---|---|
| Risk Management Module | Automates risk assessments and continuous monitoring |
| Custody Solution | Offers secure digital asset management with compliance controls |
| Traditional Instruments Integration | Simplifies reporting for both crypto and traditional assets |
| Customized Frontend | Provides tailored dashboards and reporting tools |
By implementing these tools, you can set up clear ICT risk procedures and ensure your documentation is thorough. Regular training and updates to security protocols will also help maintain compliance over time.
Meeting DORA requirements isn’t just about following regulations – it’s about creating a stronger operational foundation. These measures enhance cybersecurity and operational resilience, helping to build trust and stability in the digital asset space.
