DORA and MiCA are transforming the EU crypto market. These two regulations aim to enhance security and establish clear rules for the fast-growing crypto industry, which reached $3.2 trillion in market capitalization by late 2024. Here’s what you need to know:
- DORA (Digital Operational Resilience Act): Focuses on ICT risk management and cybersecurity for financial institutions and crypto service providers. Key rules include creating risk frameworks, incident reporting, and managing third-party IT providers. Compliance deadline: January 17, 2025.
- MiCA (Markets in Crypto-Assets): Provides a unified framework for crypto-asset regulation across the EU. It covers licensing, stablecoin rules, and market integrity. Compliance deadline: December 30, 2024.
Quick Comparison:
| Aspect | DORA | MiCA |
|---|---|---|
| Focus | ICT risk management, cybersecurity | Market regulation, consumer protection |
| Scope | All financial institutions | Crypto-specific businesses/assets |
| Key Requirements | Risk frameworks, incident reporting | Licensing, stablecoin rules |
| Enforcement | Penalties up to 2% of global revenue | Licensing suspension/revocation |
Together, DORA secures the technical backbone, while MiCA ensures market fairness and transparency. These regulations aim to create a safer, more reliable crypto ecosystem in the EU.
Who Must Follow DORA and MiCA
DORA: Affected Companies
DORA applies to a wide range of financial entities and ICT service providers within the EU, impacting over 22,000 organizations [5]. These include:
- Banks
- Insurance companies
- Investment firms
- Payment service providers
- Trading venues
- ICT third-party service providers
- Crypto-asset service providers and issuers
"The financial sector is increasingly dependent on technology and on tech companies to deliver financial services… This makes financial entities vulnerable to cyber-attacks or incidents." – EU parliament [5]
MiCA: Affected Companies and Assets
MiCA focuses on entities involved with crypto assets, such as issuers, trading platforms, custodial services, exchanges, wallet providers, and advisory firms [6]. In France, registered Digital Asset Service Providers have until July 2026 to meet the new compliance standards [2].
The table below highlights the key differences between DORA and MiCA in terms of scope and regulatory priorities.
DORA vs. MiCA Coverage
| Aspect | DORA | MiCA |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Focus | Digital operational resilience and ICT risk management | Market integrity and investor protection |
| Scope of Authority | All financial institutions and ICT providers | Crypto-specific businesses and assets |
| Regulatory Approach | Risk management and resilience testing | Licensing and product compliance |
| Enforcement Tools | Financial penalties | Market conduct enforcement |
For crypto businesses, understanding the distinction between these frameworks is critical. MiCA regulates market operations and product compliance, while DORA ensures the security and stability of technical systems. For example, custodial wallet providers must adhere to MiCA for their crypto services and DORA for their overall operational systems. Additionally, under DORA, providers handling 10% of the EU CASP market’s asset value or achieving a 10% market share are classified as Critical Third-Party Providers (CTPPs), which subjects them to stricter oversight.
Main Rules Under Each Law
DORA Rules
DORA sets strict guidelines for managing digital risks within financial entities, including crypto-asset service providers. Here are its three main focus areas:
-
ICT Risk Management Framework
Financial entities must establish solid digital risk strategies by January 17, 2025. Non-compliance could lead to fines of up to 2% of their global annual revenue [9]. -
Incident Response and Reporting
Companies are required to create incident response protocols with clear classification criteria and reporting processes to handle ICT-related events effectively [9]. -
Third-Party Risk Management
DORA requires oversight of ICT service providers. Critical third-party providers could face penalties of up to €5,000,000 for violations [9].
While DORA focuses on securing technical systems, MiCA addresses market operations.
MiCA Rules
MiCA takes a different approach, concentrating on standardizing crypto-asset market regulations. Key elements include:
-
Licensing and Authorization
All crypto service providers must secure a unified license valid across all 27 EU member states. Providers serving over 15 million active EU users will face stricter supervision [10]. -
Stablecoin Regulations
MiCA bans algorithmic stablecoins and enforces strict asset-backing rules for asset-referenced tokens. Specific provisions, such as those for asset-referenced tokens, came into effect on June 30, 2024 [12].
"The largest risk the regulation aims to counteract is the level to which the European financial system is interconnected, with an availability issue causing large-scale financial systems to be unavailable due to the interconnected webs that the European financial ecosystem relies upon."
– Ciancimino, IS Partners [9]
Rules Comparison
| Requirement | DORA | MiCA |
|---|---|---|
| Implementation Deadline | January 17, 2025 | December 30, 2024 |
| Primary Focus | ICT risk management and operational resilience | Market conduct and consumer protection |
| Key Obligations | • ICT risk management framework • Incident reporting • Third-party oversight |
• Licensing requirements • Stablecoin regulations • Market abuse prevention |
| Enforcement | Financial penalties up to 2% of global turnover | Authorization suspension or revocation |
Traditional institutions are already aligning with these rules. For example, Standard Chartered plans to secure a crypto custody license in Luxembourg by mid-2025, while Boerse Stuttgart Digital received MiCA approval in January 2025. These cases demonstrate how established organizations are adapting to MiCA’s licensing and oversight standards, showcasing the regulation’s practical impact.
Changes for Crypto Businesses
New Business Requirements
Crypto businesses are navigating new operational demands under both DORA and MiCA. After obtaining its MiCA license from the Dutch Authority for the Financial Market in December 2024, MoonPay reassessed vendor contracts and updated documentation to align with DORA’s standards [4]. To meet these regulations, crypto service providers must secure a MiCA license, implement ICT risk frameworks, establish robust governance structures, and maintain ongoing operational monitoring.
Updated Risk Management
The new regulations call for a complete overhaul of risk management strategies. In January 2025, Gemini introduced a Digital Resilience Strategy that includes ICT risk management, governance protocols, enhanced security measures, and service monitoring [4].
"Taking a proactive approach to security and building out cybersecurity measures in line with DORA may have significant implications for smaller service providers, especially startups with limited capital to comply with DORA" – Cathy Yoon, general counsel at the Wormhole Foundation [4]
Compliance Steps
Crypto businesses must follow a structured timeline to meet compliance requirements:
| Timeline | Action Items | Requirements |
|---|---|---|
| By Dec 30, 2024 | MiCA License Application | AML/KYC procedures; Financial reserves; Transparency documentation |
| By Jan 17, 2025 | DORA Implementation | ICT risk framework; Incident response plans; Third-party oversight |
| Ongoing | Continuous Compliance | Regular stress testing; Staff training; System monitoring |
One example is Coinumm‘s efforts in November 2024. The company adopted Scorechain‘s transaction monitoring and risk scoring tools to comply with AML and KYC standards, helping identify high-risk addresses and potential sanctions violations.
"All crypto asset service providers licensed under MiCA are subject to the DORA requirements" – Matt Sullivan, deputy general counsel and head of Ireland at MoonPay [4]
Businesses operating under applicable national laws before December 30, 2024, have until July 1, 2026, to achieve full compliance [2].
sbb-itb-e0da796
MiCA Regulation Explained: Europe’s New Framework for Cryptocurrency
User Protection and Market Rules
With the regulatory changes outlined earlier, new rules are in place to improve both user safety and market transparency.
User Safety Measures
MiCA and DORA introduce measures to better protect users. Service providers are now required to safeguard customer assets through methods like multi-signature wallets, insurance policies, strict access controls, and robust ICT systems [1].
| Protection Measure | MiCA Requirements | DORA Requirements |
|---|---|---|
| Asset Security | Multi-signature wallets; Insurance coverage | ICT system safeguards; Access controls |
| Dispute Resolution | Consumer resolution procedures | Incident response protocols |
| Risk Management | Financial reserves; Asset segregation | Cybersecurity frameworks; System monitoring |
Market Abuse Rules
MiCA outlines strict policies to combat insider trading, improper disclosure of information, and market manipulation [2]. Crypto exchanges and trading platforms are required to deploy advanced tools to detect such activities [2]. Professionals involved in organizing or executing crypto-asset transactions must also implement monitoring systems to identify any signs of market abuse [2].
Required Disclosures
Under MiCA, crypto-asset issuers must release detailed white papers. These documents should include issuer details, an overview of the asset, offering specifics, and risk assessments [25]. Promotional materials must align with these details and clearly state that they are advertisements [25].
DORA adds to this by requiring financial institutions to disclose their ICT risk management frameworks, incident detection processes, business continuity strategies, and cybersecurity training programs [7]. Authorities will also publicly report administrative penalties, naming the responsible parties, to deter violations [7].
These rules aim to strengthen transparency and complement earlier compliance standards.
Meeting the Requirements
Key Dates
DORA and MiCA have specific timelines that businesses must adhere to, with MiCA rolling out in two phases:
| Regulation | Component | Deadline |
|---|---|---|
| MiCA | Stablecoins (asset-referenced and e-money tokens) | June 30, 2024 |
| MiCA | Other crypto-assets and service providers | December 30, 2024 |
| DORA | All financial entities | January 17, 2025 |
| DORA | National authorities’ information registers | April 30, 2025 |
These deadlines set the stage for businesses to address several challenges during implementation.
Common Problems
Service providers often encounter issues when coordinating stakeholders and managing relationships with third parties.
- Integration Challenges: Combining frameworks for information security, resilience, and disaster recovery can be complex [32].
- Resource Constraints: Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) often face high compliance costs and lack access to crypto-regulatory expertise [34].
- Operational Adjustments: Adapting to expanded KYC requirements and stricter transaction monitoring while maintaining efficiency is a difficult balance [33].
"DORA should not be seen merely as a compliance exercise…the real challenge lies in building resilience."
– E. BOUET, Senior Manager at Wavestone [31]
Solutions and Tips
Here’s how businesses can tackle these challenges and stay compliant:
"Under the Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA), the essence lies in the five pillars that ensure financial entities maintain operational integrity and reliability. This involves directly or indirectly securing a comprehensive range of ICT capabilities through third-party services."
– Rachna Dutta, Infosecurity Consultant, Sprinto [11]
Practical Implementation Steps:
-
Assessment and Planning
Start with a gap analysis to compare your current setup against DORA and MiCA requirements. Identify critical ICT systems and create clear reporting workflows [11]. -
Technology Integration
Use automated compliance tools to streamline monitoring and reporting. For instance, in February 2025, a crypto service provider teamed up with MCO Pythagoras to automate compliance, simplifying operations and improving risk management. -
Stakeholder Management
Build open communication channels with regulators and maintain detailed records of compliance activities. Companies like Coinbase have navigated regulatory landscapes successfully by fostering collaboration with authorities [30]. Smaller businesses can benefit from RegTech tools, which simplify compliance through automation and shared expertise.
Conclusion
Key Takeaways
DORA and MiCA are reshaping the EU’s crypto market landscape. MiCA focuses on establishing rules for crypto-asset offerings and ensuring market fairness, while DORA addresses financial institutions’ ability to handle ICT-related disruptions [23]. Together, they provide a framework that balances growth with security.
Here’s a quick comparison of their differences:
| Aspect | DORA Focus | MiCA Focus |
|---|---|---|
| Main Objective | ICT risk management and cybersecurity | Market integrity and consumer protection |
| Effective Date | January 17, 2025 | December 30, 2024 |
| Target Audience | Financial institutions and critical operational systems | Crypto-asset service providers |
| Compliance Areas | Third-party oversight and incident reporting | Licensing and trading rules |
These frameworks are already influencing the global crypto ecosystem.
Global Ripple Effects
The EU’s regulations are setting new benchmarks for crypto governance worldwide. Non-EU firms now need a notable presence in the EU to serve European clients [35]. MiCA, in particular, is becoming a reference point for other regions crafting their own crypto rules [36]. As compliance requirements grow, the market could see fewer players, but with stronger and more reliable service providers [4].
Preparing for the Future
The industry is entering a period of rapid change. Businesses must align with these new regulations by adopting integrated compliance and risk management practices. Matt Sullivan, Deputy General Counsel at MoonPay, highlights that "All crypto asset service providers licensed under MiCA are subject to the DORA requirements" [4].
Financial institutions will need to incorporate crypto offerings, strengthen vendor partnerships, and enhance cybersecurity protocols [36][4][3]. While compliance costs may rise, the benefits – better investor protection and operational resilience – are expected to solidify the sector [8]. As these regulations evolve, they will address new challenges and reinforce the EU’s leadership in digital finance.
